Development of norm for Adolescent Physical Literacy Questionnaire (APLQ) in Tehran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 velenjak, daneshjoo BLVD, 19.

2 University of Tehran

Abstract

Introduction: Adolescents' physical literacy and physical activity influences their lifestyle behaviors and health-related readiness into adulthood. Lack of information about the state of physical literacy has led researchers to examine the state of physical literacy in adolescents in Tehran.
Martials and Methods: The method of the present study was descriptive and performed in the 12-18 years adolescent in Tehran. The sample were 836 adolescents who selected by multi-stage cluster sampling from different areas of the Tehran. Inclusion criteria included having physical health, not having certain diseases and movement problems or regular drug use. Subjects' physical literacy was assessed using the adolescents' physical literacy questionnaire (APLQ). This questionnaire with three dimensions examines adolescents' physical literacy and has an internal consistency coefficient (0.951) and retest reliability (0.981).
Results: The total mean scores of physical literacies in adolescents were 90.04 ± 17.12 and the desired norm was determined with a standard deviation of high and low (107.16-72.94). However, the mean scores for girls were about 85 and for boys 92, which shows a difference between the sexes and high ages.
Conclusion: The results showed that adolescents' physical literacy scores in all dimensions increase with age; Also, the scores were higher in boys than girls in all dimensions. Similar results have been reported for differences in gender and age in the Physical Literacy of Canadian children [12]. The norm presented in this study can be a basis for measuring and comparing the levels of physical literacy of adolescents in Tehran.

Keywords


1. Introduction

Physical literacy is a set of psychological (such as motivation and confidence), cognition (e.g. knowledge and understanding), and physical capacities (e.g. physical competency) to participate in physical activity for life [1, 2]. Researchers have identified physical literacy with greater participation in physical activity throughout life [3] and as a new way of enhance physical activity [4]. Most researchers acknowledge that physical literacy can be a tool for physical activity, sports success, and enjoyment of healthy living [1, 5]. The development of physical literacy in children and adolescents leads to increased physical activity and avoidance of sedentary and unhealthy lifestyle [6]. The lack of this development leads to physical activity and sedentary lifestyle.

Physical inactivity and sedentary lifestyle are a common threat to all developed countries and are considered as a serious threat to the health of generations [6]. On the other hand, children and adolescents need more physical activity than other age groups to be able to achieve proper physical growth and mental development, but research shows that the amount of physical activity decreases in adolescence [7]. Adolescents' participation in physical activity influences their lifestyle behaviors and health-related fitness into adulthood [8, 9], which can have long-term effects on life. Therefore, it seems necessary to study the physical literacy of adolescents as an important growing age group in order to identify the important factors affecting physical activity by recognizing its various aspects. In this regard, if the people have more information about their level of physical literacy, they can identify their strengths and weaknesses and try to develop it. This issue about the adolescents can be considered as a strategic issue and used by policy makers and custodial institutions such as education, parents and educators to identify the physical literacy status of adolescents to develop it comprehensively.

Despite several different studies in the field of physical literacy, in Iran, no study has been conducted to provide norms or describe the status of physical literacy in different societies, and this issue has not yet been recorded in the case of adolescents in other countries. This study is one of the first studies in describing and presenting the norm of physical literacy in adolescents, because the lack of information about the state of physical literacy in various dimensions and norms in adolescents. Lack of information in this field has led researchers to comprehensively review and describe the situation of physical literacy in adolescents in Tehran, to identify the shortcomings and strengths and weaknesses of this important and to answer the question that how is the adolescent’s physical literacy in Tehran?

 

2. Materials and Methods

The method of this study was descriptive and its purpose was to present the norm and describe the different characteristics of physical literacy of adolescents aged 18-12 years in Tehran without applying variables to them.

The study papulation included adolescents aged 12 to 18 years in Tehran. The total number of this population in 2020 was equal to 524282 people, including 273841 first high school students (132591 girls, 141250 boys), and 250441 second high school students (125348 girls, 125093 boys). The sample of this study was 836 adolescent students who were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling from different areas of Tehran. Multi-stage cluster sampling was performed as follows: First, the total population of high school students in Tehran was calculated by referring to the General Department of Education in Tehran. Then, one of the northern (Region 1), eastern (Region 8), western (Region 2), southern (Region 20) and central (Region 12) geographical areas of Tehran was randomly selected as a sample area. Then, four schools were randomly selected from each region (for boys and girls) in the first and second high schools. After randomly selecting schools, referring to schools, students of different grades were randomly selected for sampling. Inclusion criteria included having physical health, not having certain diseases and movement problems or regular drug use. Exclusion criteria included being under 12 or over 18 years old, and not completing the research tests properly.

Subjects' physical literacy was assessed using the adolescents' physical literacy questionnaire (APLQ). Adolescent Physical Literacy Questionnaire is designed specifically for adolescents aged 12-18 years. This questionnaire examines adolescents' physical literacy with three dimensions of physical fitness and activity (Physical), knowledge and awareness (cognitive), and psychological and behavioral dimension. The physical literacy questionnaire has an internal consistency coefficient (0.951), retest reliability (0.981) and concurrent validity coefficient (0.792) [10].

First, administrative correspondence was done through the university with the General Directorate of Education of Tehran. After obtaining the necessary permits, and approval of the research (by the departments of management, security and Research), five urban areas in different geographical directions (north, east, west, south and center) of Tehran were randomly selected and determined. Then, by referring to the selected affiliated offices in districts 1, 2, 8, 12 and 20, in each region, four schools (two girls' schools and two boys’ schools) in the first and second secondary schools were randomly selected. After that, by referring to the selected schools in each district, in coordination with the school officials, a questionnaire was provided to the students to proceed with the data collection. The questionnaire was available to students in the form of a paper questionnaire and in some schools as an online questionnaire (designed in Google forms). The data was obtained through it. Finally, 894 data items were collected (94 paper and 800 online form). After reviewing the collected data, items that did not meet the inclusion criteria were removed. Twenty-two questionnaires were discarded due to lack of inclusions. Also, 28 questionnaires were removed from the data due to incomplete and distorted data. Finally, 836 questionnaires remained for analysis.

This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Tehran (IR.UT.SPORT.REC.1398.060). All study participants were aware of the objectives of the study and expressed their consent to participate in the study and participated in the study voluntarily. They were also assured that they leave the research at any stage, and be informed of the results of the study upon request. The researcher did not instill any mentality in the participants during the data collection. In this study, researchers sought to adhere to all ethical principles of human studies in the Helsinki Declaration [11].

Descriptive analysis of the data was performed using central statistics and dispersion indices such as mean and standard deviation, decimals, percentiles, tables and graphs. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the effect of age and independent t-test was used to compare the gender. Significance level in calculations was considered 0.05 and for statistical calculations, Excell software version 2019 and SPSS version 24 were used.

3. Results

Table 1 shows the descriptive characteristics of the various variables measured in adolescents aged 12-18 years. Tables 2 and 3 show the descriptive statistics and normative percentages of the variables separately for the first and second high schools. Tables 4 and 5 show descriptive statistics and norm percentiles of variables by gender.

 

 

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of APLQ

Gender

n

Statistics

Age

Height

Weight

APLQ

Psychological

Cognitive

Physical

Boys

535

Mean

14.82

164.91

58.34

92.81

43.36

26.15

23.29

S. D

1.52

10.96

13.131

16.21

7.69

5.08

5.35

Norm

 

175.87-153.95

71.47-45.21

109.02-76.60

51.05- 35.67

31.23-21.17

28.64-17.94

Girls

301

Mean

15.18

157.32

52.57

85.12

40.65

24.13

20.33

S. D

1.91

8.75

11.62

17.63

7.27

6.16

6.10

Norm

 

166.07-148.57

64.19-40.95

103.20-67.94

47.92-33.38

30.29-17.98

26.43-14.23

Total

836

Mean

14.95

162.16

56.24

90.04

42.39

25.41

22.23

S. D

1.683

10.84

12.90

17.12

7.64

5.57

5.80

Norm

 

173.00-151.32

69.14-43.34

107.16-72.94

50.03-34.75

30.98-19.84

28.03-16.43

Skewness

0.170

-0.055

0.983

-0.299

-0.514

-0.421

-0.117

Kurtosis

-0.762

1.319

1.596

-0.519

0.222

-0.495

-0.528

Minimum

12

100.00

30

39

11.00

8.00

7.00

Maximum

18

198.00

125

125

55.00

35.00

35.00

 

Table 2. Percentages of first high school period APLQ scores

Percentages

Interpretation

Height

Weight

APLQ

Psychological

Cognitive

Physical

5

Very low

142.0000

38.45

57.00

29.0000

15.0000

12.0000

10

147.0000

40.00

65.00

32.0000

16.0000

13.0000

15

Low

149.0000

42.00

69.00

34.0000

18.0000

14.3500

20

150.0000

44.00

71.00

35.0000

19.0000

16.0000

25

152.0000

45.00

74.00

36.0000

20.0000

17.0000

30

Under average

155.0000

46.00

76.00

37.0000

21.0000

18.0000

35

155.0000

47.15

79.00

38.1500

23.0000

19.0000

40

157.0000

50.00

83.00

40.0000

24.0000

20.0000

45

Average

158.0500

50.00

86.00

41.0000

25.0000

20.0000

50

160.0000

52.00

89.00

42.0000

26.0000

21.0000

55

160.0000

53.95

91.00

43.9500

27.0000

22.0000

60

Upper average

162.0000

55.00

94.40

45.0000

28.0000

23.0000

65

164.8500

56.00

97.00

46.0000

28.0000

23.0000

70

165.0000

58.00

99.00

48.0000

29.0000

24.0000

75

High

167.0000

60.00

103.00

49.0000

30.0000

25.0000

80

170.0000

64.00

106.00

50.0000

30.2000

26.0000

85

175.0000

67.00

108.00

51.0000

31.0000

27.0000

90

Very high

178.0000

72.10

112.00

53.0000

32.0000

28.0000

95

182.0000

82.00

116.00

54.0000

34.0000

30.0000

100

195.0000

100.00

125.00

55.0000

35.0000

35.0000

 

Table 3. Percentages of second high school period APLQ scores

Percentages

Interpretation

Height

Weight

APLQ

Psychological

Cognitive

Physical

5

Very low

155.0000

43.45

68.00

31.0000

19.0000

14.4500

10

157.0000

47.00

73.00

33.9000

20.0000

17.0000

15

Low

158.0000

49.00

76.35

37.0000

22.0000

18.0000

20

159.0000

50.00

82.00

38.0000

23.0000

19.0000

25

160.0000

52.00

84.25

39.0000

24.0000

20.0000

30

Under average

160.0000

54.00

87.00

40.0000

24.0000

21.7000

35

160.0000

55.00

89.00

41.0000

25.0000

23.0000

40

162.0000

56.00

91.00

42.0000

25.0000

23.0000

45

Average

163.0500

57.00

93.00

43.0000

26.0000

24.0000

50

164.0000

59.00

95.00

44.0000

26.0000

25.0000

55

165.0000

60.00

96.95

44.0000

27.0000

25.0000

60

Upper average

166.0000

60.00

99.00

45.0000

27.0000

26.0000

65

167.0000

63.00

100.00

46.0000

28.0000

26.8500

70

168.0000

65.00

102.00

46.3000

29.0000

27.0000

75

High

170.0000

66.00

103.75

48.0000

30.0000

28.0000

80

170.0000

67.00

106.00

49.0000

30.0000

29.0000

85

172.0000

70.00

109.00

50.0000

31.0000

30.6500

90

Very high

175.0000

75.00

112.00

51.0000

32.0000

31.0000

95

179.5500

81.65

117.00

54.0000

34.0000

33.0000

100

198.0000

125.00

125.00

55.0000

35.0000

35.0000

 

Table 4. Percentages of girls APLQ scores

Percentages

Interpretation

Height

Weight

APLQ

Psychological

Cognitive

Physical

5

Very low

140.0000

39.00

55.00

28.1000

14.0000

11.0000

10

145.0000

40.00

63.00

32.0000

16.0000

13.0000

15

Low

148.3000

41.00

67.00

33.3000

17.0000

14.0000

20

150.0000

43.00

69.00

35.0000

18.4000

14.0000

25

151.0000

44.00

72.00

36.0000

20.0000

15.0000

30

Under average

155.0000

45.60

75.00

37.0000

20.0000

16.0000

35

156.0000

47.00

76.70

38.0000

22.0000

17.0000

40

157.0000

48.00

79.00

39.0000

23.0000

18.0000

45

Average

158.0000

49.00

82.00

40.0000

24.0000

19.0000

50

159.0000

50.00

85.00

41.0000

25.0000

20.0000

55

159.0000

52.00

87.10

42.0000

26.0000

21.0000

60

Upper average

160.0000

53.00

89.20

42.0000

26.0000

22.0000

65

160.0000

55.00

93.00

43.0000

27.0000

23.0000

70

162.0000

57.00

96.00

44.0000

28.0000

24.0000

75

High

163.0000

59.50

99.00

45.0000

29.0000

25.0000

80

164.6000

62.00

102.00

47.0000

30.0000

26.0000

85

166.0000

65.70

104.70

48.7000

31.0000

27.0000

90

Very high

168.0000

68.80

108.00

50.0000

32.0000

28.0000

95

170.0000

75.90

116.00

52.0000

34.0000

31.0000

100

180.0000

95.00

125.00

55.0000

35.0000

35.0000

 

Table 5. Percentages of boys APLQ scores

Percentages

Interpretation

Height

Weight

APLQ

Psychological

Cognitive

Physical

5

Very low

148.7500

40.00

65.00

30.0000

17.0000

14.0000

10

150.0000

45.00

71.00

33.0000

19.0000

17.0000

15

Low

155.0000

45.00

74.00

35.0000

20.0000

18.0000

20

155.0000

48.00

77.00

37.0000

21.0000

19.0000

25

158.0000

50.00

82.00

38.0000

23.0000

20.0000

30

Under average

160.0000

50.00

86.00

40.0000

24.0000

20.0000

35

160.0000

53.00

88.00

41.0000

25.0000

21.0000

40

162.0000

54.00

90.00

42.0000

25.0000

22.0000

45

Average

163.0000

55.00

92.00

43.0000

26.0000

23.0000

50

165.0000

56.00

95.00

44.0000

27.0000

23.0000

55

165.0000

58.00

97.00

45.0000

27.2500

24.0000

60

Upper average

166.0000

60.00

99.00

46.0000

28.0000

25.0000

65

168.0000

60.00

101.00

47.0000

29.0000

26.0000

70

170.0000

63.00

103.00

49.0000

29.0000

26.5000

75

High

172.0000

65.00

105.00

50.0000

30.0000

27.0000

80

175.0000

67.00

107.00

51.0000

31.0000

28.0000

85

176.0000

70.00

110.00

51.7500

32.0000

29.0000

90

Very high

180.0000

75.00

114.00

53.0000

32.0000

30.0000

95

183.0000

85.00

117.00

54.0000

33.0000

32.0000

100

198.0000

125.00

125.00

55.0000

35.0000

35.0000

 

 

Independent t-test was used to compare the physical literacy levels of adolescent girls and boys. The results of independent t-test showed that there was a significant difference between girls and boys in physical literacy scores (P<0.001, t(468)= 3.720; Table 6); Girls' scores (M=85.12±17.63) was lower than boys (M=92.81±16.21; Table 1). This difference in scores was also observed in the three dimensions of physical literacy.

 

Table 6. Results of independent t-test between girls and boys in AMCQ dimensions and scale

AMCQ dimensions

t

df

sig

Physical

7.270

834

0.001

Psychological

4.956

834

0.001

Cognitive

5.133

834

0.001

ALPQ

6.369

834

0.001

One-way analysis of variance at different ages was used to investigate the differences in age groups physical literacy. The results of analysis of variance test in the difference between age groups showed that the effect between groups is significant (P=0.001, F(6,829)=28.752; Table 7). The results of Bonferroni post hoc test showed that there was a significant difference in physical literacy score between most age groups (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups 14.15, 16 and 17 years (P<0.05). Also, there was no significant difference between groups 17 and 18 years old (P<0.05). Figure 1 Shows the physical literacy scores of sample people by age and gender.

 

 

Table 7. Results of analysis of variance in Physical literacy variable

 

Sum of squares

df

Mean square

F

Sig.

Between groups

Within groups

Total

42172

202656

244828

6

829

835

7028.7

244.4

28.752

0.001

 

 

Figure 1. The mean scores of physical literacy by age and gender

 

 

4. Discussion

Physical literacy is one of the concepts related to active lifestyle, which has different positive effects and benefits at different ages, such as increased physical activity. The development of physical literacy affects various dimensions such as active lifestyle, physical activity, knowledge and motivation to participate in lifelong physical activity. The higher levels of physical literacy in the community may lead to the higher level of active lifestyle and physical activity. High levels of physical literacy in adolescents ensure active life in adulthood. Low levels of physical literacy in adolescents can raise concerns about physical activity and active lifestyle and the negative consequences of inactivity such as related diseases and obesity, and create overweight. Accurate physical literacy assessment is important to assess the status, formulate and design lifestyle and health promotion programs. No research has been reported in Iran and other countries regarding the mean and normal range of variables measured by adolescents' physical literacy.

5. Results

The average scores of physical literacy of adolescents was equal to 90.04±17.12. The desired norm was determined by a deviation of high and low standards (107.16-72.94). However, the mean scores were 85 for girls and 92 for boys, which shows a clear difference between the sexes. The mean observed was 89 for lower-age high school students and 95 for higher-age high school students. These scores were observed based on the minimum and maximum scores obtained in the test, which are equal to 25 and 125, and show the distance between many of the minimum scores. The average score of the psychological dimension of adolescents' physical literacy questionnaire in Tehran was equal to 42.39±7.64. The desired norm is determined by a deviation of high and low standard (50.03-34.75). The mean scores were 40 for girls, 43 for boys, 42 for lower-age high school and 44 for higher-age high school students. The minimum and maximum scores obtained in this test were equal to 25 and 125. The average score of cognitive dimension of adolescents physical literacy questionnaire was equal to 25.041±5.57. The desired norm is determined by a deviation of high and low standard (30.98-19.84). The mean scores were 24 for girls, 26 for boys, 26 for lower-age high school and 26 for higher-age high school students. Also, the average score of the physical dimension of adolescents' physical literacy in Tehran was equal to 22.23±5.80. Meanwhile, the average scores for girls were 20, 23 for boys, 20 for the lower-age high school and 25 for the higher-age high school students. These scores indicate that adolescents' physical literacy scores in all dimensions increase with increasing level of school education. Also, physical literacy scores, regardless of age, are higher among boys than scores in girls, and this was observed in all dimensions.

Similar results were found for the difference between gender and age in the Physical Literacy Survey of Canadian children, with girls scoring lower than boys in most sections of the Physical Literacy Assessment in Canada, as well as older children had higher physical literacy scores than younger children [12]. However, the Canadian study was conducted on children aged 8-12 years using a CAPL tool designed specifically for children.

In the present study, the mean height of the subjects was 162.16±10.64 cm and its norm were in the range 173.00-151.32 with one standard deviation interval. The mean height of boys was 164.91, 10, 10.06 with the norm of 175.87-153.95. Also, the average weight of the subjects was 56.24±12.90 kg and its norm were in the range 69.14- 43.34 with one standard deviation interval. The mean weight of girls was 52.57, 11, 11.62 kg with norm 64.19-40.95, and the mean weight of boys was 58.34±13.13 kg with norm of 71.47-45.21. In a study done by Derakhshan (1998) on adolescents, similar results were obtained and the average scores of height and weight of girls were reported to be lower than boys [13]. These differences in the size of global norms and sources of human growth have also been confirmed [14].

The findings of the present study confirmed the gender difference: girls had lower scores in motivation and psychological dimension than boys [15]. The development of physical literacy, in addition to development of physical fitness, should be based on increase the motivation to participate and knowledge about physical activity; so, it can have long-term effects on people's lifestyles [16]. Research has shown that intrinsic motivation can affect physical activity and lifestyle through changes in goals and behaviors, and people with higher intrinsic motivation maintain their level of physical activity over time [17]. The current findings indicate the importance of paying more attention to the psychological aspects of physical literacy, such as the motivation to participate in physical activity in girls.

The studies have shown that boys have higher motor competence than girls. The reason for this difference is due to the higher participation of boys in physical activity and sports compared to girls [18]. That was in line with the findings of the present study. The physical dimension of physical literacy in APLQ includes items in the field of physical fitness as well as daily and weekly physical activity. The superiority of boys in physical dimension scores can be due to differences in both areas of participation in activity and their higher physical fitness. These findings also point to more attention to the development of physical literacy in girls, which showed lower scores. Physical literacy emphasis on lifelong health and well-being [1] through physical activity, also increase and maintaining physical activity in life [20].

Thus, it is important to pay more attention to the development of physical competence, especially in girls [17]. This can be done through program-based physical education to develop participation in physical activity and physical literacy [19].

6. Conclusion

The purpose of this study was to prepare the norm of physical literacy of high school students in Tehran to be a criterion for evaluating the level of physical literacy and knowledge of different levels of physical literacy in adolescents. It is hoped that the norm presented in this study can be a basis for measuring and comparing the levels of physical literacy of adolescents in Tehran.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed to the original idea, study design.

Ethical considerations

The present study was approved by Ethics Committee of the Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Tehran.

Data availability

The dataset generated and analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

This study did not receive any grant from any institution/company/university.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank all the students and participants in the research.

[1] Keegan RJ, Barnett LM, Dudley DA, Telford RD, Lubans DR, Bryant AS, et al. "Defining physical literacy for application in Australia: a modified Delphi method". Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2019; 38(2): 105-18.

[2] Whitehead M. Definition of Physical Literacy: Developments and Issues. Physical Literacy across the World: Routledge. 2019.

[3] Whitehead M. "Physical literacy and its importance to every individual". National Disability Association Ireland, Dublin, Ireland Assessed online March 2007; 10:2007.

[4] Whitehead M. "Definition of physical literacy and clarification of related issues". ICSSPE Bulletin. 2013; 65(1.2).

[5] Farrey T, Isard R. Physical Literacy in the United States: A Model, Strategic Plan and Call to Action. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute. 2015.

[6] Keegan R, Keegan S, Daley S, Ordway C, Edwards A. Getting Australia Moving: Establishing a Physically Literate Active Nation (Game Plan). University of Canberra, Centre of Excellence in Physical Literacy and Active. 2013.

[7] Asefi AA, Amoozadeh Z. "The codification of model of significant others roles and adolescence’s participation in physical activity and sport". Research on Educational Sport. 2017; 5(13): 17-38.

[8] Babic MJ, Morgan PJ, Plotnikoff RC, Lonsdale C, White RL, Lubans DR. "Physical activity and physical self-concept in youth: systematic review and meta-analysis". Sports Medicine. 2014; 44(11): 1589-601.

[9] Rodrigues LP, Luz C, Cordovil R, Bezerra P, Silva B, Camões M, et al. "Normative values of the motor competence assessment (MCA) from 3 to 23 years of age". Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2019; 22(9): 1038-43.

[10] Mohammadzadeh M, Sheikh M, Houminiyan Sharif Abadi D, Bagherzadeh F, Kazemnejad A. Design and Psychometrics Evaluation of Adolescent Physical Literacy Questionnaire (APLQ). Sport Sciences for Health. 2021.

[11] Association WM. "World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects". Jama. 2013; 310(20): 2191-4.

[12] Tremblay MS, Longmuir PE, Barnes JD, Belanger K, Anderson KD, Bruner B, et al. "Physical literacy levels of Canadian children aged 8–12 years: descriptive and normative results from the RBC Learn to Play–CAPL project". BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(2): 1036.

[13] Derakhshan M. "A survey of Height and Weight of Students Aged 11-17 Years in Hamadan". Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine. 1998; 5(1).

[14] Gallahue D, Ozmun J. Understanding Motor Development: Infants, Children, Adolescents, Adults. Boston: McGraw-Hill. 2006.

[15] Lauderdale ME, Yli-Piipari S, Irwin CC, Layne TE. "Gender differences regarding motivation for physical activity among college students: A self-determination approach". The Physical Educator. 2015; 72(5): 153-172.

[16] Mohamadzadeh M, Sheykh M, Hoominian D, Bagherzadeh F, Kazemnejad A. "Presenting a Conceptual Model of Physical Literacy Development in Iran: Applying Grounded Theory". Research on Educational Sport. 2021; 9(25): 195-220.

[17] Dishman RK, McIver KL, Dowda M, Pate RR. "Declining physical activity and motivation from middle school to high school". Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2018; 50(6): 1206.

[18] Timler A, McIntyre F, Hands B. "Adolescents' self-reported motor assessments may be more realistic than those of their parents". British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2018; 81(4): 227-33.

[19] O'Brien W, Belton S, Issartel J. "Promoting physical literacy in Irish adolescent youth: the Youth-Physical Activity Towards Health (Y-PATH) Intervention". MedCrave Online Journal of Public Health. 2015; 2(6): 1-6.

[20] Jones GR, Stathokostas L, Young BW, Wister AV, Chau S, Clark P, et al. "Development of a physical literacy model for older adults – a consensus process by the collaborative working group on physical literacy for older Canadians". BMC Geriatrics. 2018; 18(1): 13.