Introduction: This study aimed to review the literature on the role of body composition as a risk factor for injury in an athletic population. Materials and Methods: We searched articles in English in Google Scholar Science direct, PubMed, WOS, Scopus, ProQuest, and Cochrane Library databases without time limit until 2020 using keywords related to "body composition" and "sports injury". Results: Considering criteria including inclusion and exclusion, 10 papers out of 1322 studies were comprehensively reviewed. It was found that body composition components are related to musculoskeletal injuries in the athletic population. Body mass index, weight and bone density are known as risk factors in the development of sports injuries. Conclusion: This systematic review provides preliminary evidence of the relationship between body composition and prediction of injury in athletes. Defects in various aspects of body composition were recognized as potential risk factors for lower extremity injuries. Likewise, body composition should be considered when screening athletes.
Amirshaghaghi,F , Pournemati,P and Zandi,S . (2019). Body Composition Role in Predicting Sports Injuries: A Systematic Review. Sport Sciences and Health Research, 11(2), 71-80. doi: 10.32598/JESM.11.2.3
MLA
Amirshaghaghi,F , , Pournemati,P , and Zandi,S . "Body Composition Role in Predicting Sports Injuries: A Systematic Review", Sport Sciences and Health Research, 11, 2, 2019, 71-80. doi: 10.32598/JESM.11.2.3
HARVARD
Amirshaghaghi F, Pournemati P, Zandi S. (2019). 'Body Composition Role in Predicting Sports Injuries: A Systematic Review', Sport Sciences and Health Research, 11(2), pp. 71-80. doi: 10.32598/JESM.11.2.3
CHICAGO
F Amirshaghaghi, P Pournemati and S Zandi, "Body Composition Role in Predicting Sports Injuries: A Systematic Review," Sport Sciences and Health Research, 11 2 (2019): 71-80, doi: 10.32598/JESM.11.2.3
VANCOUVER
Amirshaghaghi F, Pournemati P, Zandi S. Body Composition Role in Predicting Sports Injuries: A Systematic Review. SSHR. 2019;11(2):71-80. doi: 10.32598/JESM.11.2.3