Sport Sciences and Health Research

Sport Sciences and Health Research

Sport Sciences in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Rethinking Education, Specialisation, and Professional Roles

Document Type : Research Paper

Author
Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
10.22059/sshr.2026.423234.1280
Abstract
Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming sport sciences through machine learning, computer vision, wearable technologies, generative models, and decision-support systems. This editorial argues that the central challenge is no longer whether AI will enter sport sciences, but whether educational programmes, professional roles, and governance structures will adapt sufficiently to ensure its responsible use. Although AI can enhance performance analysis, injury-risk assessment, training design, physical-activity promotion, and sport management, algorithmic outputs remain dependent on data quality, validation, population representativeness, and contextual interpretation. Sport-science professionals therefore require competencies extending beyond routine technology use, including data literacy, critical appraisal, ethical reasoning, interdisciplinary collaboration, and the ability to evaluate uncertainty, bias, fairness, and external validity. Curricula should integrate AI across sport-science disciplines, while assessment should increasingly emphasise judgement, evidence verification, and context-specific decision-making. Professional roles must also shift from producing and reporting information toward interpreting evidence, governing technology, and assuming responsibility for decisions. Responsible adoption further requires clear standards for privacy, transparency, accountability, equity, and human oversight. Ultimately, AI should augment rather than replace professional expertise. The future of sport sciences will depend on professionals who combine computational literacy with scientific knowledge, contextual understanding, ethical judgement, and human-centred decision-making.
Keywords

1.             International Olympic Committee. Olympic AI Agenda. 2024.
2.             Mateus N, Abade E, Coutinho D, Gómez MÁ, Lago-Peñas C, Sampaio J. Empowering the sports scientist with artificial intelligence in training, performance, and health management. Sensors. 2025;25(1):139. doi: 10.3390/s25010139.
3.             Claudino JG, Capanema DO, de Souza TV, Serrão JC, Pereira ACM, Nassis GP. Current approaches to the use of artificial intelligence for injury risk assessment and performance prediction in team sports: a systematic review. Sports Medicine - Open. 2019;5:28. doi: 10.1186/s40798-019-0202-3.
4.             Cust EE, Sweeting AJ, Ball K, Robertson S. Machine and deep learning for sport-specific movement recognition: a systematic review of model development and performance. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2019;37(5):568-600. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1521769.
5.             Van Eetvelde H, Mendonça LD, Ley C, Seil R, Tischer T. Machine learning methods in sport injury prediction and prevention: a systematic review. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics. 2021;8(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00346-x.
6.             Miao F, Cukurova M. AI competency framework for teachers. Paris: UNESCO, 2024.
7.             World Health Organization. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.
8.             Killoughery IT, Pitsiladis YP. Olympic AI agenda: we need collaboration to achieve evolution. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2024;58(19):1095-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108667.
9.            Raftery M, Falvey EC. Rugby's implementation lessons: the importance of a 'compliance wedge' to support successful implementation for injury prevention. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2022;56(1):1-2. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103454.